RESEARCH ARTICLE


Evidence on the Comparison of Telephone and Internet Surveys for Respondent Recruitment



Dimitris Potoglou*, 1, Pavlos S. Kanaroglo2, Neil Robinson1
1 RAND Europe, Westbrook Centre, Milton Road, Cambridge, CB4 1YG, UK
2 Centre for Spatial Analysis (CSpA), School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
0
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 203
Abstract HTML Views: 642
PDF Downloads: 239
Total Views/Downloads: 1084
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 154
Abstract HTML Views: 444
PDF Downloads: 162
Total Views/Downloads: 760



© 2012 Potoglou et al;

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the RAND Europe, Westbrook Centre, Milton Road, Cambridge, CB4 1YG, UK; Tel: +441223 353329; Fax: +441223358845; E-mail: dimitris@rand.org


Abstract

Internet surveys have a potential use for survey research when compared against costs and declining response rates of traditional modes as they form a powerful tool for reducing respondents' burden in complex questionnaires. On the other hand, there exists scepticism about the reliability and robustness of the collected data. Arenze et al. (2005) argue that case studies involving Internet surveys cannot be generalised to other countries and have recommended systematic collection and reporting of experiences worldwide. Such studies have had limited exposure in the transport literature. This paper provides empirical evidence on the comparison between telephone and Internet surveys in the context of a car ownership study. The comparison between telephone and Internet modes focuses on performance measures such as response speed, response rates, survey costs, demographic profiles and geographical representation of the sample. The results indicate the cost effectiveness of Internet surveys. Moreover, they show that the time and cost for data collection significantly vary by sampling and recruitment method. Finally, Internet survey response rates are lower than those in the telephone interview, which implies that Internet surveys can only be used to complement traditional data collection methods.

Keywords: Telephone surveys, internet surveys, survey comparison, car ownership, recruitment.