RESEARCH ARTICLE
Spatial Analysis of the Contribution of Parking Service Facilities to Traffic Crashes along Limited-access Roadways
Fathi Alkhatni1, 2, Siti Zaharah Ishak1, 3, *, Wardati Binti Hashim4, Muhamad Nazri Borhan5, Elsaid Mamdouh Mahmoud Zahran6
Article Information
Identifiers and Pagination:
Year: 2023Volume: 17
E-location ID: e187444782212300
Publisher ID: e187444782212300
DOI: 10.2174/18744478-v17-e230109-2022-35
Article History:
Received Date: 2/8/2022Revision Received Date: 6/11/2022
Acceptance Date: 11/11/2022
Electronic publication date: 08/02/2023
Collection year: 2023
open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Background and Objective:
Parking service facilities (PSFs) are integral components of road networks and are typically designated to offer road users, stakeholders, and external entities various services and opportunities. However, the current literature manifests contradictions among studies regarding the contribution of PSFs to crashes in the mainline traffic stream. This study aims to assess the contribution of PSFs to traffic crashes on limited-access expressways using hotspot analysis of traffic crashes in GIS.
Methods:
Planar Getis-Ord Gi* and network KDE were used to detect crash hotspots along a study road based on five criteria: crash frequency of all vehicle types, frequency of all vehicles involved in crashes, frequency of heavy vehicles involved in crashes, injury severity index and iRAP star rating.
Results:
The study identified and ranked the safety hazard of PSFs along the study road via the interference and risk level of crash hotspots with influential segments of PSFs. Getis-Ord Gi* analysis showed that almost 65% of PSFs along the study road were potentially high-risk facilities, with their influential segments interfering with crash hotspots based on the five hotspot analysis criteria. On the other hand, network KDE identified that almost 100% of PSFs along the study road were potentially high-risk facilities of either serious, significant or moderate risk levels based on the same hotspot analysis criteria.
Conclusion:
The two spatial analyses indicated that crashes in proximity to PSFs may increase when the number of lanes of their influential road segments increases and traffic flow is interrupted by other road facilities. They also indicated that crash frequency and severity increase in the proximity to PSFs with high speed and high traffic volume. Furthermore, the two analyses indicated that heavy vehicle crashes are more likely to increase in proximity to PSFs in rural areas.
