A Pilot Field Study of Influence of Restricted Sight Distances on Gap- Acceptance and Non-Gap-Acceptance RTOR Driving Behaviors

Xuedong Yan*, 1, 2, Stephen Richards2
1 MOE Key Laboratory for Transportation Complex Systems Theory and Technology, Beijing Jiaotong University, Shangyuancun, Haidian District, Beijing, 100044, P.R. China
2 Southeastern Transportation Center (STC), The University of Tennessee, Suite 309, Conference Center Building, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-4133, USA

Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 325
Abstract HTML Views: 781
PDF Downloads: 197
Total Views/Downloads: 1303
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 218
Abstract HTML Views: 497
PDF Downloads: 131
Total Views/Downloads: 846

Creative Commons License
© 2010 Yan and Richards;

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Southeastern Transportation Center (STC), The University of Tennessee, Suite 309, Conference Center Building, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-4133, USA; Tel: (865) 974-0298; E-mail:


Right turn on red (RTOR) is permitted at signalized intersection in the United States. Adequate intersection sight distances should be provided to ensure that the RTOR drivers turn into receiving lanes safely and efficiently. However, in practice it is not unusual to find signalized intersections with restricted right-turn sight distances, at which RTOR is still permitted. This research is focused on investigating if restricted right-turn sight distances have a significant impact on RTOR behaviors. A pilot field observation study was conducted at four signalized intersections: two with restricted right-turn sight distances and two with sufficient sight distances for 25 mph and 35 mph speed limits, respectively. Using a video camera, both gap-acceptance and non-gap-acceptance RTOR behavior data were collected at the intersections. In comparisons of RTOR behaviors at intersections with and without sight-distance problems, it was found that a restricted sight distance can cause drivers to seriously encroach into pedestrian crossings in order to maximize available sight distances at the intersections; lead to a higher non-stop RTOR violation rate; cause drivers to accept smaller gaps; and increase the possibility of conflicting with pedestrians. Due to these significantly negative effects on RTOR behaviors, traffic engineers are appealed to pay more attention to the right-turn sight distance issue at signalized intersections.

Keywords: Sight distance, RTOR, signalized intersections, gap acceptance, non gap acceptance traffic conflict, pedestrian safety.